In this study, African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 270) described how they felt and appraised their own actions in response to a peer's victimization.
Analyses compared times participants had calmed victim emotions, amplified anger, avenged, and resolved conflicts peacefully. Adolescents felt prouder, more helpful, more like a good friend, and expected more peer approval after calming and resolving than after amplifying anger or avenging peers. They also felt less guilt and shame after calming and resolving. Avenging elicited more positive self-evaluation than amplifying. Epistemic network analyses explored links between self-evaluative and other emotions. Pride was linked to relief after efforts to calm or resolve. Third-party revenge reflected its antisocial and prosocial nature with connections between pride, relief, anger, and guilt. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Characterization of 114 Insertion/deletion (INDEL) Polymorphisms, and Selection for a Global INDEL Panel for Human Identification
- Where Are Our Children? A Data Scan of Native Youth Incarceration in Minnesota
- Declines in victims calling the police in 21st-century America: how the trends vary by race/ethnicity and racial-immigration contexts