Each victim was assigned to one of three treatment conditions: interview and written victim impact statement, interview only, and no interview or statement. During the intake procedure, victims rated the effects of their victimization in terms of physical harm, short-term financial impact, long-term financial impact, psychological harm, and behavioral changes. Victims were recontacted after one month to update information in their statements. Contrary to previous findings, the results reported here did not find that victim impact statements resulted in defendants receiving harsher sentences, nor did they produce sentencing decisions that reflected the effects of the crime on victims. There was little evidence that judges were influenced in their sentencing decisions by measures of the effects of crime on victims, once the charge and defendant's criminal history were taken into account. 3 tables, 4 notes, and 22 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Violence As Regulation and Social Control in the Distribution of Crack (From Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences, P 8-43, 1990, Mario De La Rosa, Elizabeth Y Lambert, Bernard Gropper, eds. -- See NCJ-128781)
- FINAL REPORT: EVALUATION OF PRETRIAL HOME DETENTION WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING
- DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION ON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND MEDICAL UTILIZATION